Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Spark Connect Gateway — Session Affinity, Auth, and Multi-Tenancy for Spark Connect Servers

[Jerry Tan]

+1 (non-binding) On Aug 5, 2026, at 6:33 PM, bo yang <bobyan...@gmail.com> wrote:  +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 9:06 PM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: +1 From: Zhou Jiang <zhou.c.ji...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2026 8:49 PM To: dev@spark.apache.org <dev@spark.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Spark Connect Gateway — Session Affinity, Auth, and Multi-Tenancy for Spark Connect Servers   +1 (non-binding) > On Aug 5, 2026, at 20:47, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 > > Thank you, Liang-Chi. > > Dongjoon. > >> On 2026/08/06 02:57:50 "L. C. Hsieh" wrote: >> Hi all, >> >>  I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP "Spark Connect Gateway". >> >>  The SPIP proposes an official Spark Connect Gateway — a standalone, >> wire-compatible gRPC proxy that sits in front of a pool of Spark Connect >> servers. >> >>  The SPIP document has been updated along the way to address the feedback >> raised in the discussion thread, including protocol coupling, >>  session-loss semantics, the trust boundary between the gateway and the >> backends, etc. >> >>  - JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-58455 >>  - SPIP doc: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16RNnRJjSDBSlcgeBjVz_Mv-SkqvH33F9tIsR1Ii_P3c/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.221xxblzqzu >> >>  Please vote on the SPIP: >> >>  [ ] +1 Accept the proposal >>  [ ] +0 >>  [ ] -1 I don't think this is a good idea because … >> >>  The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >>  Thanks! >>  Liang-Chi >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org