Show some evidence for what? I've not stated any conclusions. I am asking a question: given our concerns about committer diversity in November, does the PMC feel like we have made adequate progress?
If no, what do we plan to do about it? If yes, what is the justification? Aside from Lakmal's response just now, I find it a little puzzling that nobody has given a straight answer to this. The only real reply to this question has been to challenge it's premise: that this isn't important. Also note: if there is an agreement that there are no candidates that have been overlooked (even if we take into account non-code contributions) then that still leaves us with a question: are we doing everything we can to attract contributions? On 23 March 2014 03:59, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sanjiva, >> >> That's great! But the other things Stratos is doing right are orthogonal >> issues. >> >> I'm not proposing that we nominate people randomly. That's a strawman. >> But I've been told on this thread that we've seen a lot more >> participation since Novemeber. But we've only had three additional >> committer elections. So what's going on there? >> >> My concern is that the PMC might be having some issues recognising >> non-WSO2 merit. > > > Noah, can you please go through the mail archives and list down a few > deserving non-WSO2 contributors who the PMC has failed to nominate for > committership? Rather than theorizing, it would be nice if you can show some > evidence. -- Noah Slater https://twitter.com/nslater
