IMO we should keep the names as consistent as possible so my vote would go for:
- com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.action2 - WebWork* classes -> Struts* - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. - ww: tag prefix -> a:/saf: so pretty much as Rainer's vote. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. On 3/25/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don, > > I think using Struts Ti on the one hand and Struts Action 2 on the other > as a name will lead to some confusion. Ti as a codename is great, but for > the codebase I would prefer Action2. > > > - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.ti > > - WebWork* classes -> Struts* > > - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 > > - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. > > - ww: tag prefix -> a: > > +1 for this proposal but with package name 'org.apache.struts.action2' > +1 for either a: or saf: > > cheers, > Rainer > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
