Hubert Rabago wrote:
On 3/24/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see the problem with Action2 either. Hopefully, we will
someday see an Action3 and Action4 too.
But, regardless of what I think, I would suggest that we wait a few
days and give the other new committers a chance to chime in. Ian
indicated a preference for saf, and the other new committers might
have a preference too.
+0. Or +1 if I had time to volunteer.
I could live with action2 as well. Now that I'm seeing this renaming
from this perspective though, I'm wishing some of it mentions WebWork.
In fact I wish we could do something like org.apache.struts.webwork.
I don't know how that would look like, though.
- com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.webwork
Actually, the above is the renaming that seems to make the most sense a
priori. This is the exact same code now being hosted under
org.apache.struts (struts now being an umbrella of sorts) so simply
changing com.opensymphony -> org.apache.struts is the most natural
thing. It is the transition that would be readily clearest to webwork
users transitioning to the apache-hosted code.
It's up to the webwork people (it's their work and I'm just a casual
observer) but if it were my work, I would be insisting that the webwork
name remain at this package naming level.
- WebWork* classes -> WebWork*
- WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts WebWork
- webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> webwork.
- ww: tag prefix -> ww:
No obvious reason to change this prefix. Why should existing webwork
users have to deal with a frivolous prefix change like that?
That's my 2c. Like tm jee (TJ?), I'd be okay with any naming strategy
the community settles on.
I understand of course that technically it makes no difference, but my
sense of things is that if the webwork people passively let the Struts
people remove the string "webwork" from all these package names, they
will not be starting off this relationship on the best foot. The Struts
people will cry that they are so innocent and all (such wonderful
people) but surely there is some agenda in wanting to excise "webwork"
and "ww" from all the code, isn't there?
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
FreeMarker group blog, http://freemarker.blogspot.com/
Hubert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
