On 3/24/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see the problem with Action2 either. Hopefully, we will
> someday see an Action3 and Action4 too.
>
> But, regardless of what I think, I would suggest that we wait a few
> days and give the other new committers a chance to chime in. Ian
> indicated a preference for saf, and the other new committers might
> have a preference too.

+0.  Or +1 if I had time to volunteer.

I could live with action2 as well.  Now that I'm seeing this renaming
from this perspective though, I'm wishing some of it mentions WebWork.
 In fact I wish we could do something like org.apache.struts.webwork. 
I don't know how that would look like, though.

 - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.webwork
 - WebWork* classes -> WebWork*
 - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts WebWork
 - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> webwork.
 - ww: tag prefix -> ww:

That's my 2c.  Like tm jee (TJ?), I'd be okay with any naming strategy
the community settles on.

Hubert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to