On 3/25/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't the purpose of this to excise the webwork name? I thought > it was. Why else would you want to become "Struts 2.0" if not > for the name? I don't see this renaming as a slam against the heritage, > but this entire process doesn't make any sense unless you're specficially > wanting to be rebranded as Struts. > -- Paul
>From a historical perspective, it might be worthwile to note that the process begin with a post that Patrick Lightbody made to the "Java Web Alignment Group", in which Patrick said that he would like to see WebWork "join forces" with another project. Don and I followed up with Patrick and Jason. Our initial discussions are archived here: * http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/STRUTS2/Home Whlie we were having these discussions, several other developers became active within WebWork and also became WW committers. To include these people in the process, we broadened the incubator proposal and asked the other WW committers if they wanted to sign on. * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg17308.html Everyone choose to do so, and here we are. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
