I'm not sure I'd worry about it. Howard's post said it only made 1ms difference.
Bob On 12/12/06, dice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The custom OGNLValueStack made little difference. AFAIK, the majority of the OGNL calls are dealing with the tag parameters in the tag templates which are not simple java properties. It's a pity. I was looking forward to using Struts 2 on our next major project but much like JSF it is too risky from a performance perspective. Back to Struts 1 ... *sigh* Bob Lee wrote: > > We noticed the same thing. Maybe we should replace it with JSP-EL? (I > don't > have time to rewrite OGNL myself.) > > In the mean time, we wrote a custom version of OgnlValueStack..... > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-performance-detrimental-to-Struts-2-tf2804655.html#a7847866 Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
