Thanks, Jens! I want to include https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2307 (THRIFT-5337) as well, I'm just waiting for travis to pass.
Also does anyone know if we have any known issues with travis? the travis runs for that PR always failed with a very long delay then not running anything, I'm not sure if it's the author's way of creating the PR is weird and triggered some corner case of travis, or is travis just not working in general. I'll create another PR with the same code to try to get travis running. On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 12:48 AM Jens Geyer <jensge...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Unless there are no objections from anyone I am going to create the 0.14.0 > branch tomorrow, based on whatever is on master at that time. > > Since nobody seems interested enough in reviewing/fixing this minorish > issue, THRIFT-5344 will not be included. > > Have fun, > JensG > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > From: Jens Geyer > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:53 AM > To: dev@thrift.apache.org > Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release? > > Hi, > > > Can reviewed them and I merged them today > > So technically we are where we want to be? That's good news indeed. > > > Please give me a few more days, > > Much appreciated, looking forward to it. > > Thanks for all the work, > JensG > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > From: Yuxuan Wang > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 5:32 AM > To: dev@thrift.apache.org > Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release? > > Can reviewed them and I merged them today. Please give me a few more days, > I'll deploy our production system to the newest master version on Tuesday, > and run it for a few days to make sure that there's no bugs and such. > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:00 PM Jens Geyer <jensge...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Cool! Can you throw some info mail when all is ready? I'll cut the branch > > then and see how far I can get it done. > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > From: Duru Can Celasun > > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 11:46 PM > > To: dev@thrift.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release? > > > > I have those PRs on my backlog, sorry for the delay :) I'll definitely > > take > > a look this week. > > > > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, at 22:40, Yuxuan Wang wrote: > > > For Go I certainly want to merge > > > https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2298 > > > & https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2296 before the next release > > > (v0.14.0). @Can might take a look at them? :) > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:38 PM Duru Can Celasun <dcela...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm in favour of cutting a new release, though I never did one for > > > > thrift > > > > and I won't have the time to get involved any time soon. > > > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, at 21:47, Jens Geyer wrote: > > > > > @all > > > > > > > > > > > Good question. I'm in favour of it. Who does it? > > > > > > > > > > That was actually a real question. I support the proposal but would > > > > > like > > > > to > > > > > know the opinion of other people. > > > > > - Anything we absolutely should include in the next release (i.e. > > > > blockers)? > > > > > - Or is everybody happy already and thinks we are ready to cut a > > > > > branch > > > > and > > > > > do the real heavy lifting? > > > > > > > > > > That's not a real vote, but at least some feedback would be > helpful. > > > > > > > > > > Have fun, > > > > > JensG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > From: Yuxuan Wang > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 9:41 PM > > > > > To: dev@thrift.apache.org > > > > > Subject: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release? > > > > > > > > > > Judging from history the end of the years are usually when we do > > > > releases, > > > > > is there a plan for 0.14.0 release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
