Hey Jens, Yes. It's a trivial change that I can have ready today.
Thanks. On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:38 AM Jens Geyer <jensge...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > you have a time plan for the latter? > > JensG > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > From: David > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 3:24 PM > To: dev@thrift.apache.org > Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release? > > Hello, > > I would like to add two more items before cutting a new release: > > THRIFT-5297 > ... and subsequently ... > THRIFT-5346 > > > Thanks. > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:09 AM Yuxuan Wang <yuxuan.w...@reddit.com > .invalid> > wrote: > > > OK that one is merged. > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:57 AM Yuxuan Wang <yuxuan.w...@reddit.com> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks, Jens! I want to include > > https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2307 > > > (THRIFT-5337) as well, I'm just waiting for travis to pass. > > > > > > Also does anyone know if we have any known issues with travis? the > > > travis > > > runs for that PR always failed with a very long delay then not running > > > anything, I'm not sure if it's the author's way of creating the PR is > > weird > > > and triggered some corner case of travis, or is travis just not working > > in > > > general. I'll create another PR with the same code to try to get travis > > > running. > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 12:48 AM Jens Geyer <jensge...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> Unless there are no objections from anyone I am going to create the > > >> 0.14.0 > > >> branch tomorrow, based on whatever is on master at that time. > > >> > > >> Since nobody seems interested enough in reviewing/fixing this minorish > > >> issue, THRIFT-5344 will not be included. > > >> > > >> Have fun, > > >> JensG > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> From: Jens Geyer > > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:53 AM > > >> To: dev@thrift.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release? > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> > Can reviewed them and I merged them today > > >> > > >> So technically we are where we want to be? That's good news indeed. > > >> > > >> > Please give me a few more days, > > >> > > >> Much appreciated, looking forward to it. > > >> > > >> Thanks for all the work, > > >> JensG > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> From: Yuxuan Wang > > >> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 5:32 AM > > >> To: dev@thrift.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release? > > >> > > >> Can reviewed them and I merged them today. Please give me a few more > > days, > > >> I'll deploy our production system to the newest master version on > > Tuesday, > > >> and run it for a few days to make sure that there's no bugs and such. > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:00 PM Jens Geyer <jensge...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > Cool! Can you throw some info mail when all is ready? I'll cut the > > >> branch > > >> > then and see how far I can get it done. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > From: Duru Can Celasun > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 11:46 PM > > >> > To: dev@thrift.apache.org > > >> > Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release? > > >> > > > >> > I have those PRs on my backlog, sorry for the delay :) I'll > > >> > definitely > > >> > take > > >> > a look this week. > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, at 22:40, Yuxuan Wang wrote: > > >> > > For Go I certainly want to merge > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2298 > > >> > > & https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2296 before the next > > release > > >> > > (v0.14.0). @Can might take a look at them? :) > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:38 PM Duru Can Celasun < > > dcela...@apache.org> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm in favour of cutting a new release, though I never did one > > >> > > > for > > >> > > > thrift > > >> > > > and I won't have the time to get involved any time soon. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, at 21:47, Jens Geyer wrote: > > >> > > > > @all > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Good question. I'm in favour of it. Who does it? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > That was actually a real question. I support the proposal but > > >> would > > >> > > > > like > > >> > > > to > > >> > > > > know the opinion of other people. > > >> > > > > - Anything we absolutely should include in the next release > > (i.e. > > >> > > > blockers)? > > >> > > > > - Or is everybody happy already and thinks we are ready to > cut > > >> > > > > a > > >> > > > > branch > > >> > > > and > > >> > > > > do the real heavy lifting? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > That's not a real vote, but at least some feedback would be > > >> helpful. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Have fun, > > >> > > > > JensG > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >> > > > > From: Yuxuan Wang > > >> > > > > Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 9:41 PM > > >> > > > > To: dev@thrift.apache.org > > >> > > > > Subject: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Judging from history the end of the years are usually when we > > >> > > > > do > > >> > > > releases, > > >> > > > > is there a plan for 0.14.0 release? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >
