Hey Jens,
Yes. It's a trivial change that I can have ready today.
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:38 AM Jens Geyer <jensge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> you have a time plan for the latter?
>
> JensG
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> From: David
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 3:24 PM
> To: dev@thrift.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release?
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to add two more items before cutting a new release:
>
> THRIFT-5297
> ... and subsequently ...
> THRIFT-5346
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:09 AM Yuxuan Wang <yuxuan.w...@reddit.com
> .invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > OK that one is merged.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:57 AM Yuxuan Wang <yuxuan.w...@reddit.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Jens! I want to include
> > https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2307
> > > (THRIFT-5337) as well, I'm just waiting for travis to pass.
> > >
> > > Also does anyone know if we have any known issues with travis? the
> > > travis
> > > runs for that PR always failed with a very long delay then not
> > > running
> > > anything, I'm not sure if it's the author's way of creating the PR
> > > is
> > weird
> > > and triggered some corner case of travis, or is travis just not
> > > working
> > in
> > > general. I'll create another PR with the same code to try to get
> > > travis
> > > running.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 12:48 AM Jens Geyer <jensge...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Unless there are no objections from anyone I am going to create the
> > >> 0.14.0
> > >> branch tomorrow, based on whatever is on master at that time.
> > >>
> > >> Since nobody seems interested enough in reviewing/fixing this
> > >> minorish
> > >> issue, THRIFT-5344 will not be included.
> > >>
> > >> Have fun,
> > >> JensG
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> From: Jens Geyer
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:53 AM
> > >> To: dev@thrift.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release?
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> > Can reviewed them and I merged them today
> > >>
> > >> So technically we are where we want to be? That's good news indeed.
> > >>
> > >> > Please give me a few more days,
> > >>
> > >> Much appreciated, looking forward to it.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for all the work,
> > >> JensG
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> From: Yuxuan Wang
> > >> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 5:32 AM
> > >> To: dev@thrift.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release?
> > >>
> > >> Can reviewed them and I merged them today. Please give me a few
> > >> more
> > days,
> > >> I'll deploy our production system to the newest master version on
> > Tuesday,
> > >> and run it for a few days to make sure that there's no bugs and
> > >> such.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:00 PM Jens Geyer <jensge...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Cool! Can you throw some info mail when all is ready? I'll cut
> > >> > the
> > >> branch
> > >> > then and see how far I can get it done.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> > From: Duru Can Celasun
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 11:46 PM
> > >> > To: dev@thrift.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release?
> > >> >
> > >> > I have those PRs on my backlog, sorry for the delay :) I'll
> > >> > definitely
> > >> > take
> > >> > a look this week.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, at 22:40, Yuxuan Wang wrote:
> > >> > > For Go I certainly want to merge
> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2298
> > >> > > & https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2296 before the next
> > release
> > >> > > (v0.14.0). @Can might take a look at them? :)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:38 PM Duru Can Celasun <
> > dcela...@apache.org>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > I'm in favour of cutting a new release, though I never did
> > >> > > > one
> > >> > > > for
> > >> > > > thrift
> > >> > > > and I won't have the time to get involved any time soon.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, at 21:47, Jens Geyer wrote:
> > >> > > > > @all
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Good question. I'm in favour of it. Who does it?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > That was actually a real question. I support the proposal
> > >> > > > > but
> > >> would
> > >> > > > > like
> > >> > > > to
> > >> > > > > know the opinion of other people.
> > >> > > > > - Anything we absolutely should include in the next release
> > (i.e.
> > >> > > > blockers)?
> > >> > > > > - Or is everybody happy already and thinks we are ready to
> cut
> > >> > > > > a
> > >> > > > > branch
> > >> > > > and
> > >> > > > > do the real heavy lifting?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > That's not a real vote, but at least some feedback would be
> > >> helpful.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Have fun,
> > >> > > > > JensG
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >> > > > > From: Yuxuan Wang
> > >> > > > > Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 9:41 PM
> > >> > > > > To: dev@thrift.apache.org
> > >> > > > > Subject: Plans/process for 0.14.0 release?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Judging from history the end of the years are usually when
> > >> > > > > we
> > >> > > > > do
> > >> > > > releases,
> > >> > > > > is there a plan for 0.14.0 release?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
>
