Maybe working on referencing these pages via perhaps a blog post from someone would be cool. Something along the lines of "Creating a graph db with Tinkerpop" or some other variation that may get good hit results in a google search.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > We've seen a lot of new graphs come out that don't do TinkerPop from the > start. Perhaps they make a conscious decision not to - i dunno. I just > wonder if part of the problem is the provider docs for doing an > implementation: > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.0-incubating/dev/provider/ > > are they easy enough to find? do folks understand them and what it means to > be tinkerpop-enabled? the docs could probably be improved - any graph > providers out there want to take a stab at it? in some ways your external > experience at implementing might be helpful in improving them. > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > See https://github.com/haifengl/unicorn > > > > They say they support a "Gremlin-like API." It would be really cool if > > they just implemented TinkerPop's Graph API. Perhaps someone feels like > > creating a ticket at their main repo explaining how to go about > supporting > > TinkerPop? Or, even better, providing them a PR! > > > > https://github.com/adplabs/unicorn > > > > Take care, > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > >
