Psssht, the original Uni_pop _has Tinkerpop support, and a better unicorn
logo...
Seriously though, for wider Tinkerpop adoption it would be cool to have a
general "Provider Template" along with the tutorial/blogpost :
* Default `structure` implementation, with /*IMPLEMENT READ/WRITE/ETC HERE*/
in the relevant places.
* Default `process` implemantions (i.e. `TraversalStrategy`s). This should
probably be "commented out" at first, and "uncommented" after the basic
structure implementation is working.
* Default setup of test suites.
* Configurations
* pom.xml
* Gremlin Console plugin
* Utility scripts (e.g. deploy&run in console/server)
On May 25 2016, at 5:36 pm, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed. A big on-going problem TinkerPop has is that people invariably
stumble upon TinkerPop 2 and Blueprints/Pipes. If they find TP2, maybe they
presume it is dead, so they roll their own.
>
> I've been tinkering recently in this space, more specifically to better
understand the gremlin-test suite in general. A blog post sounds like a
good idea. I can take a stab at it.
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Dylan Millikin
<dylan.milli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > Maybe working on referencing these pages via perhaps a blog post from
> someone would be cool. Something along the lines of "Creating a graph db
> with Tinkerpop" or some other variation that may get good hit results in
a
> google search.
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Mallette
<spmalle...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We've seen a lot of new graphs come out that don't do TinkerPop from
the
> > start. Perhaps they make a conscious decision not to - i dunno. I
just
> > wonder if part of the problem is the provider docs for doing an
> > implementation:
> >
> > <http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.0-incubating/dev/provider/>
> >
> > are they easy enough to find? do folks understand them and what it
means
> to
> > be tinkerpop-enabled? the docs could probably be improved - any
graph
> > providers out there want to take a stab at it? in some ways your
external
> > experience at implementing might be helpful in improving them.
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Marko Rodriguez
<okramma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > See https://github.com/haifengl/unicorn
> > >
> > > They say they support a "Gremlin-like API." It would be really
cool if
> > > they just implemented TinkerPop's Graph API. Perhaps someone
feels like
> > > creating a ticket at their main repo explaining how to go about
> > supporting
> > > TinkerPop? Or, even better, providing them a PR!
> > >
> > > https://github.com/adplabs/unicorn
> > >
> > > Take care,
> > > Marko.
> > >
> > > <http://markorodriguez.com>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
