> but maybe perhaps Stephen would like to get a talk like that at Cassandra Summit?
hehe - i'm sure you could have found a way to make that topic interesting. i'm not so sure i could. :) > Psssht, the original Uni_pop _has Tinkerpop support, and a better unicorn logo... ha! > Seriously though, for wider Tinkerpop adoption it would be cool to have a general "Provider Template" along with the tutorial/blogpost : the "provider template" could be an addition to the maven archetypes we have then you just do: mvn archetype:generate -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.tinkerpop -DarchetypeArtifactId=gremlin-archetype-provider -DarchetypeVersion=3.2.1 -DgroupId=com.my-DartifactId=my-tinkerpop-implementation i'm not sure i want to volunteer to do that one, but that would be kinda cool. the only downside is that it's a fair bit of trouble to maintain a template/archetype for something that probably won't see a ton of use - unless there are suddenly hundreds of tinkerpop implementations :) On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> wrote: > More stuff --- > > One thing I think that we really need to drive home to providers is > TraversalStrategies. That should be a blog post too. I've talked to two > graph databases providers recently and both were concerned about > performance through the TinkerPop API. They didn't know they could write > provider-specific strategies to bypass TinkerPop and talk directly to their > databases native APIs/optimizations. Once that was clear, both were like > "ahhhhhhh…." > > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > On May 25, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Ran Magen <rma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Psssht, the original Uni_pop _has Tinkerpop support, and a better unicorn > > logo... > > > > > > > > Seriously though, for wider Tinkerpop adoption it would be cool to have > a > > general "Provider Template" along with the tutorial/blogpost : > > > > * Default `structure` implementation, with /*IMPLEMENT READ/WRITE/ETC > HERE*/ in the relevant places. > > > > * Default `process` implemantions (i.e. `TraversalStrategy`s). This > should probably be "commented out" at first, and "uncommented" after the > basic structure implementation is working. > > * Default setup of test suites. > > * Configurations > > * pom.xml > > * Gremlin Console plugin > > * Utility scripts (e.g. deploy&run in console/server) > > > > On May 25 2016, at 5:36 pm, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Agreed. A big on-going problem TinkerPop has is that people invariably > > stumble upon TinkerPop 2 and Blueprints/Pipes. If they find TP2, maybe > they > > presume it is dead, so they roll their own. > > > >> > > > >> I've been tinkering recently in this space, more specifically to better > > understand the gremlin-test suite in general. A blog post sounds like a > > good idea. I can take a stab at it. > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Dylan Millikin > > <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Maybe working on referencing these pages via perhaps a blog post > from > > > someone would be cool. Something along the lines of "Creating a > graph db > > > with Tinkerpop" or some other variation that may get good hit > results in > > a > > > google search. > > > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Mallette > > <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > We've seen a lot of new graphs come out that don't do > TinkerPop from > > the > > > > start. Perhaps they make a conscious decision not to - i > dunno. I > > just > > > > wonder if part of the problem is the provider docs for doing an > > > > implementation: > > > > > > > > < > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.0-incubating/dev/provider/> > > > > > > > > are they easy enough to find? do folks understand them and > what it > > means > > > to > > > > be tinkerpop-enabled? the docs could probably be improved - any > > graph > > > > providers out there want to take a stab at it? in some ways > your > > external > > > > experience at implementing might be helpful in improving them. > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Marko Rodriguez > > <okramma...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > See https://github.com/haifengl/unicorn > > > > > > > > > > They say they support a "Gremlin-like API." It would be > really > > cool if > > > > > they just implemented TinkerPop's Graph API. Perhaps > someone > > feels like > > > > > creating a ticket at their main repo explaining how to go > about > > > > supporting > > > > > TinkerPop? Or, even better, providing them a PR! > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/adplabs/unicorn > > > > > > > > > > Take care, > > > > > Marko. > > > > > > > > > > <http://markorodriguez.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
