Hi, > I've been tinkering recently in this space, more specifically to better > understand the gremlin-test suite in general. A blog post sounds like a > good idea. I can take a stab at it.
Cool. >> Maybe working on referencing these pages via perhaps a blog post from >> someone would be cool. Something along the lines of "Creating a graph db >> with Tinkerpop" or some other variation that may get good hit results in a >> google search. My planned talked for Cassandra Summit this year is about "how to build a TinkerPop-enabled graph system." I am probably going to change my talk to something more wild so its fun for me, but maybe perhaps Stephen would like to get a talk like that at Cassandra Summit? >>> We've seen a lot of new graphs come out that don't do TinkerPop from the >>> start. Perhaps they make a conscious decision not to - i dunno. I just >>> wonder if part of the problem is the provider docs for doing an >>> implementation: >>> >>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.0-incubating/dev/provider/ The non-GremlinServer section of those docs suck and they should really be written by someone who has built an implementation. They are out of date, not able to take advantage of Kuppitz doc builder code runner stuff, and generally limp… (** before you get all hot and heavy with "Marko be open to other people's work" note that I wrote those docs. And yes, they suck.) Take care, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com
