If it helps any, I can push up the latest TomEE version to the TomEE profile: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/blob/master/pom.xml#L690
John On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:07 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > In terms of statements of compliance, which of these Java EE 7 samples > will currently run successfully? > > - https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples < > https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples> > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:19 AM, ross.cohen <ross.cohen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Actually, it looks like a 7.0 release means different things to different > > people. Romain, you took everyone's approval of the idea of a 7.0.0 > release > > to be an approval of your particular version of a 7.0.0 release, which it > > clearly was not. Looks to me like a finer-grained vote is needed to > figure > > out exactly what people want as part of 7.0.0 release. > > > > Personally, I think David is correct in saying that a release without > some > > kind of positive JEE 7 compatibility statement is a serious mistake. I > know > > the TCK is out of the question right now, but that simply means you need > to > > invent an alternative compatibility statement: "Apache-Certified > Compliant > > to Web Profile Specifications" (or some such). > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/7-0-0-release-vote-tp4678284.html > > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
