No worries on the many posts. Thank you for the Java EE 7 samples checkup :)
It appears we fail 35% of the JAX-RS 2.0 tests. Do we know what is preventing us from passing those tests? -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On May 1, 2016, at 6:42 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > Sorry for so many posts :-) > > TomEE Plus 7.0.0-M3 passes 238/338 tests in the suite. > > John > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I ended up changing the version and updating the code. I ran the tests, >> you can see the output in this gist: >> https://gist.github.com/johnament/2443e79836605a913159b14295681536 >> >> TomEE Plus fails at about 100 tests. >> >> John >> >> >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:10 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> If it helps any, I can push up the latest TomEE version to the TomEE >>> profile: >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/blob/master/pom.xml#L690 >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:07 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In terms of statements of compliance, which of these Java EE 7 samples >>>> will currently run successfully? >>>> >>>> - https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples < >>>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> David Blevins >>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>> >>>>> On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:19 AM, ross.cohen <ross.cohen...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Actually, it looks like a 7.0 release means different things to >>>> different >>>>> people. Romain, you took everyone's approval of the idea of a 7.0.0 >>>> release >>>>> to be an approval of your particular version of a 7.0.0 release, which >>>> it >>>>> clearly was not. Looks to me like a finer-grained vote is needed to >>>> figure >>>>> out exactly what people want as part of 7.0.0 release. >>>>> >>>>> Personally, I think David is correct in saying that a release without >>>> some >>>>> kind of positive JEE 7 compatibility statement is a serious mistake. >>>> I know >>>>> the TCK is out of the question right now, but that simply means you >>>> need to >>>>> invent an alternative compatibility statement: "Apache-Certified >>>> Compliant >>>>> to Web Profile Specifications" (or some such). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/7-0-0-release-vote-tp4678284.html >>>>> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>>
