On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:44 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not portable test, jpa on not jpa tests etc. We pass really more tests > AFAIK. Could you elaborate on that a little? What is not portable? If you want to raise issues in our ticket system please feel free: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/issues Or if you want to just say them, I can put them into github. > Le 2 mai 2016 05:48, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > No worries on the many posts. Thank you for the Java EE 7 samples > checkup > > :) > > > > It appears we fail 35% of the JAX-RS 2.0 tests. Do we know what is > > preventing us from passing those tests? > > > > > > -- > > David Blevins > > http://twitter.com/dblevins > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > On May 1, 2016, at 6:42 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > Sorry for so many posts :-) > > > > > > TomEE Plus 7.0.0-M3 passes 238/338 tests in the suite. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> I ended up changing the version and updating the code. I ran the > tests, > > >> you can see the output in this gist: > > >> https://gist.github.com/johnament/2443e79836605a913159b14295681536 > > >> > > >> TomEE Plus fails at about 100 tests. > > >> > > >> John > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:10 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> If it helps any, I can push up the latest TomEE version to the TomEE > > >>> profile: > > >>> > > > https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/blob/master/pom.xml#L690 > > >>> > > >>> John > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:07 PM David Blevins < > david.blev...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> In terms of statements of compliance, which of these Java EE 7 > samples > > >>>> will currently run successfully? > > >>>> > > >>>> - https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples < > > >>>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> David Blevins > > >>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:19 AM, ross.cohen <ross.cohen...@gmail.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Actually, it looks like a 7.0 release means different things to > > >>>> different > > >>>>> people. Romain, you took everyone's approval of the idea of a > 7.0.0 > > >>>> release > > >>>>> to be an approval of your particular version of a 7.0.0 release, > > which > > >>>> it > > >>>>> clearly was not. Looks to me like a finer-grained vote is needed > to > > >>>> figure > > >>>>> out exactly what people want as part of 7.0.0 release. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Personally, I think David is correct in saying that a release > without > > >>>> some > > >>>>> kind of positive JEE 7 compatibility statement is a serious > mistake. > > >>>> I know > > >>>>> the TCK is out of the question right now, but that simply means you > > >>>> need to > > >>>>> invent an alternative compatibility statement: "Apache-Certified > > >>>> Compliant > > >>>>> to Web Profile Specifications" (or some such). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> View this message in context: > > >>>> > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/7-0-0-release-vote-tp4678284.html > > >>>>> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > >
