Not portable test, jpa on not jpa tests etc. We pass really more tests AFAIK. Le 2 mai 2016 05:48, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> No worries on the many posts. Thank you for the Java EE 7 samples checkup > :) > > It appears we fail 35% of the JAX-RS 2.0 tests. Do we know what is > preventing us from passing those tests? > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On May 1, 2016, at 6:42 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Sorry for so many posts :-) > > > > TomEE Plus 7.0.0-M3 passes 238/338 tests in the suite. > > > > John > > > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> I ended up changing the version and updating the code. I ran the tests, > >> you can see the output in this gist: > >> https://gist.github.com/johnament/2443e79836605a913159b14295681536 > >> > >> TomEE Plus fails at about 100 tests. > >> > >> John > >> > >> > >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:10 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> If it helps any, I can push up the latest TomEE version to the TomEE > >>> profile: > >>> > https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/blob/master/pom.xml#L690 > >>> > >>> John > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:07 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> In terms of statements of compliance, which of these Java EE 7 samples > >>>> will currently run successfully? > >>>> > >>>> - https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples < > >>>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> David Blevins > >>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>> > >>>>> On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:19 AM, ross.cohen <ross.cohen...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Actually, it looks like a 7.0 release means different things to > >>>> different > >>>>> people. Romain, you took everyone's approval of the idea of a 7.0.0 > >>>> release > >>>>> to be an approval of your particular version of a 7.0.0 release, > which > >>>> it > >>>>> clearly was not. Looks to me like a finer-grained vote is needed to > >>>> figure > >>>>> out exactly what people want as part of 7.0.0 release. > >>>>> > >>>>> Personally, I think David is correct in saying that a release without > >>>> some > >>>>> kind of positive JEE 7 compatibility statement is a serious mistake. > >>>> I know > >>>>> the TCK is out of the question right now, but that simply means you > >>>> need to > >>>>> invent an alternative compatibility statement: "Apache-Certified > >>>> Compliant > >>>>> to Web Profile Specifications" (or some such). > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> View this message in context: > >>>> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/7-0-0-release-vote-tp4678284.html > >>>>> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>>> > >>>> > >
