On 30/11/15 19:17, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Montag, 30. November 2015, 15:55:13 schrieb Matthew Toseland: >> Not if we jettison the slower opennet nodes, which is also part of the >> proposal. A lot of our performance issues are actually because we target >> an outdated lowest common denominator. > Sadly this isn’t true: Most of our users have low bandwidth, as shown > by the stats from Steve: > > http://127.0.0.1:8888/USK@pxtehd-TmfJwyNUAW2Clk4pwv7Nshyg21NNfXcqzFv4,LTjcTWqvsq3ju6pMGe9Cqb3scvQgECG81hRdgj5WO4s,AQACAAE/statistics/1048/plot_peer_count.png > > Best wishes, > Arne How much of this is due to default settings where it didn't manage to autodetect via UPnP? How much to users not making informed choices?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
