On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:26:00PM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote: > >>>>> "AL" == Adrian Lopez <adrian2 at caribe.net> writes: > > AL> It seems like various people here would rather do away with > AL> KSKs. I'd like these people to address how data submission > AL> might be dealt with in lieu of public keyspace. How would > AL> in-freenet key indices work without KSKs? How would things > AL> like EOF be implemented if users aren't able to submit data > AL> under public keys bearing a particular prefix? > > I think both of them could be handled by having a > public-write-private-read key type -- kind of like an SSK in reverse.
This would not require an extra key-type, it would merely require that
