On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:50:51AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +0000, Adrian Lopez wrote: > > It seems like various people here would rather do away with KSKs. I'd > > like these people to address how data submission might be dealt with in > > lieu of public keyspace. How would in-freenet key indices work without > > KSKs? How would things like EOF be implemented if users aren't able to > > submit data under public keys bearing a particular prefix? > > (I'm assuming I have the permission of the Freenet Government to discuss > this subject. If not, please say so and I'll have myself executed > immediately.)
Well, since whatever network the proposal you outline below is intended for is very obviously not Freenet, I would recommend that you take the discussion to a group regarding that network. I mean, if you are going to assign one single node a task of taking care of the list - then why do you want to go through Freenet at all, short of maybe making sure that 90% of the people who want the list will not find it (for the hundreth time: Freenet does not work by routing requests to the data, it works by moving the data to where the requests are)? <> -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg md98-osa at nada.kth.se _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Wed Apr 18 19:35:36 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
