>From Peter Todd
>On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +0000, Adrian Lopez wrote:
>> It seems like various people here would rather do away with KSKs. I'd
>> like these people to address how data submission might be dealt with in
>> lieu of public keyspace. How would in-freenet key indices work without
>> KSKs? How would things like EOF be implemented if users aren't able to
>> submit data under public keys bearing a particular prefix?
>
>You would give out the private key of a SSK for submissions.

I've got it: you could just take the human-readable part of the SSK, hash it, 
and use that number as the private key.

--
Benjamin Coates


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From - Tue Apr 17 01:42:45 2001
Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
        by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA06369
        for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 21:13:36 -0400
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 3D95658161; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org
Received: from moe.cc.utexas.edu (moe.cc.utexas.edu [128.83.42.2])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F114557FF8
        for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (blanu at localhost)
        by moe.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/cc-uts-client-1.11) with ESMTP id 
TAA09326

Reply via email to