On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +0000, Adrian Lopez wrote: > It seems like various people here would rather do away with KSKs. I'd > like these people to address how data submission might be dealt with in > lieu of public keyspace. How would in-freenet key indices work without > KSKs? How would things like EOF be implemented if users aren't able to > submit data under public keys bearing a particular prefix?
The simple answer is we do not believe that these systems work at the moment, therefore there is no loss. > Is getting rid of KSKs really worth having to rely on external services > for collecting data? Or maybe getting rid of KSKs is simply shattering the illusion that we don't... -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg md98-osa at nada.kth.se _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue Apr 17 17:35:18 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA10026 for <danello at danky.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:24:53 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E1B580F5; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 07:06:10 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from mail1.telia.com (t2o70p62.telia.com [62.20.148.182]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1855B5806D for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 07:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hobbex by mail1.telia.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14pW1R-0000Em-00
