Hi, I'm having interrogations about the use of the WoT plugin and I'm confronted to a choice :
The plugin is able to handle multiple local identites. But do you think it could be usefull to allow local identities to set different trust levels on other identities. Possibilities are : 1) One identity publish its trustlist and all local identities share the same trust tree. 2) Every local identity has to handle its own trust list and has its own trust tree. That implies that one identity might see someone while another won't. In my opinion, 1) would fit most uses of the plugin. Except the one where you share your node with a person you totally disagree with (quite unlikely, isn't it ?). The flaw of 2) is that every identity has to set its own trust values for every identities. An option could be to allow the user to set a "parent" identity that the new identity would share it's trust list with. What do you think ? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080512/d253869e/attachment.pgp>
