* Julien Cornuwel <batosai at batosai.net> [2008-05-12 19:14:06]: > Hi, > > I'm having interrogations about the use of the WoT plugin and I'm > confronted to a choice : > > The plugin is able to handle multiple local identites. But do you think > it could be usefull to allow local identities to set different trust > levels on other identities. > > Possibilities are : > > 1) One identity publish its trustlist and all local identities share the > same trust tree. > 2) Every local identity has to handle its own trust list and has its own > trust tree. That implies that one identity might see someone while > another won't. > > In my opinion, 1) would fit most uses of the plugin. Except the one > where you share your node with a person you totally disagree with (quite > unlikely, isn't it ?). > > The flaw of 2) is that every identity has to set its own trust values > for every identities. An option could be to allow the user to set a > "parent" identity that the new identity would share it's trust list with. > > > What do you think ?
Go for the second option -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/89167f44/attachment.pgp>
