When you publish a shared trust tree with 2 identities, everyone could easily figure out that this two identities are the same person.
I think option 2 together should be implemented, added with the possibility to take over (selected) trust states from other local identities. On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Julien Cornuwel <batosai at batosai.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having interrogations about the use of the WoT plugin and I'm > confronted to a choice : > > The plugin is able to handle multiple local identites. But do you think > it could be usefull to allow local identities to set different trust > levels on other identities. > > Possibilities are : > > 1) One identity publish its trustlist and all local identities share the > same trust tree. > 2) Every local identity has to handle its own trust list and has its own > trust tree. That implies that one identity might see someone while > another won't. > > In my opinion, 1) would fit most uses of the plugin. Except the one > where you share your node with a person you totally disagree with (quite > unlikely, isn't it ?). > > The flaw of 2) is that every identity has to set its own trust values > for every identities. An option could be to allow the user to set a > "parent" identity that the new identity would share it's trust list with. > > > What do you think ? > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -- __________________________________________________ GnuPG key: (0x48DBFA8A) Keyserver: pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Fingerprint: 477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A __________________________________________________
