On Tuesday 25 November 2008 22:20, Zero3 wrote:
> Florent Daigniere skrev:
> > Zero3 wrote:
> >   
> >>
> >> IMHO, Freenet should be packaged for Linux distros anyway, compeletely 
> >> eliminating the need for a Linux installer (besides whatever scripting 
> >> the package installation requires) and terminal installation procedures.
> >>     
> >
> > Send a patch.
> >
> >   
> Is that meant as a "i-don't-care-smart-ass-comment" or a friendly 
> suggestion?
> 
> >> I am aware of certain people thinking that Freenet develops too 
> >> quickly/doesn't fit into package systems at all, but the advantages 
> >> still seem to be much greater than the disadvantages as I see it.
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > We all agree that packaging makes sense... but they are two problems in 
> > freenet's case:
> >     1- the source code evolves too fast, meaning that the packages will be 
> > unsuitable to be included in the main distro's repositories... That 
> > means that the user *will* have to do something to his packaging system 
> > to install freenet. On debian that would mean adding a new repository: 
> > arguably that's not simple and it requires r00t priviledges, which isn't 
> > the case of the current installer.
> >     2- Lack of manpower: It's way faster/easier to maintain ONE platform 
> > agnostic installer than N packages for N distributions.
> >   
> 
> 1) Surely it is possible to package connectable version of Freenet which 
> will automatically update itself over Freenet (or perhaps a fallback to 
> update over http)? (If package managers won't allow you to override 
> packaged files, update to an "overlay" directory where any files will 
> transparently override the packaged files)

Perhaps, but it is likely incompatible with being incorporated into a distro's 
own repository.
> 
> 2) Once you have created the packages and take advantage of the features 
> of package management, it seems easier to me. But that's a hard thing to 
> argue both for or against.

The point is we need regular updating.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081125/af1829b5/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to