On 12/20/2012 10:05 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 05:43:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/20/2012 1:30 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Note that in the first place, bytecode discussion has started with the need of
provide a CTFEable module that do not contains more information that what is in
a DI file, as it is a concern for some companies.
Bytecode can solve that problem nicely IMO. You mentioned that DI is superior
here, but I don't really understand how.
No, it doesn't solve that problem at all. I explained why repeatedly.
No you explained that java's bytecode doesn't solve that problem. Which is quite
different.
Please reread all of my messages in the thread. I addressed this.
