On 12/21/2012 09:37 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 21.12.2012 08:02, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/20/2012 10:05 PM, deadalnix wrote:
No you explained that java's bytecode doesn't solve that problem.
Which is quite
different.
I did, but obviously you did not find that satisfactory. Let me put it
this way:
Design a bytecode format, and present it here, that is CTFEable and is
not able to be automatically decompiled.
Sorry, can't resist: How about feeding the x86 machine byte code
(including some fixup information) into an interpreter? Maybe not
realistic,
http://bellard.org/jslinux/
but a data point in the field of possible "byte codes". The
interpreter might even enjoy hardware support ;-)
Direct hardware support is not achievable because CTFE needs to be pure
and safe.
That might not cover all possible architectures, but if the distributed
library is compiled for one platform only, CTFEing against another won't
make much sense anyway.
