On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 23:06:56 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote:
????
So in these case I will forget D, and cry all the tears of my
body. It will just a shame for a system language.
And it's certainly kind of applications actually miss for D, to
improve his visibility.
Yes, but nobody that are in the "decision making body" of D has
shown any resemblance of understanding or priority for real time
applications. Seriously, the language is close to ten years in
the making.
Just take a look around you all applications are interactive,
with more animations,...
Yeah, but at some point you just have to accept that people who
don't have a need to write real time will avoid putting it on the
road map.
I would like to see a roadmap that says "real time" and "no gc"
and "whole program optimization", "owned pointers", "shared
pointers"++
I see no road map.
