Le 11/02/2014 00:12, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
<ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com>" a écrit :
On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 23:06:56 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote:
????
So in these case I will forget D, and cry all the tears of my body. It
will just a shame for a system language.
And it's certainly kind of applications actually miss for D, to
improve his visibility.
Yes, but nobody that are in the "decision making body" of D has shown
any resemblance of understanding or priority for real time applications.
Seriously, the language is close to ten years in the making.
Just take a look around you all applications are interactive, with
more animations,...
Yeah, but at some point you just have to accept that people who don't
have a need to write real time will avoid putting it on the road map.
Boostrapping D, will certainly reveal some issue with GC? I don't know
much about compilers, but certainly the parser may see some performance
gains with GC and the other parts? Maybe some major loose?
I am curious to see that as a benchmark comparator.
It's not real-time but it's a serious system application challenge.
I would like to see a roadmap that says "real time" and "no gc" and
"whole program optimization", "owned pointers", "shared pointers"++
I see no road map.
