On Monday, 16 April 2012 at 07:00:19 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Monday, 16 April 2012 at 06:37:00 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-04-16 04:35, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 4/13/12 9:10 PM, deadalnix wrote:
SDC have a lot of theses, and I proposed a similar stuff for
its
evolution. I think it is easier for SDC than it is for dmd
considering
the codebase of both.
Cool! SDC is the way to go. Let's focus our efforts on that
project. :-)
I noticed that SDC is licensed under the GPL license :( That
is not compatible with, for example, EPL used by Eclipse.
We are changing the license soon, with BSD/MIT in mind. I am
really just waiting for Bernard to make the change, we've
gotten permission from all contributors as far as I know.
Oh god, what did we decide on? Boost?
