On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 09:58:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"David Nadlinger" <s...@klickverbot.at> wrote in message
news:voymctvtskltfzhsl...@forum.dlang.org...
On Monday, 16 April 2012 at 11:57:29 UTC, Bernard Helyer wrote:
Oh god, what did we decide on? Boost?
Imho, MIT is just fine for a compiler. It's not like a line of
attribution is much to ask when you are getting an entire
compiler fronend for free - in fact, applications should
probably mention the compiler frontend they use in the docs
anyway in case there are incompatibilities, .
There's no attribution in MIT.
Yes, there is no attribution:
https://github.com/roman-d-boiko/SDC/blob/master/LICENCE. It is
very similar to Boost. Actually, I prefer Boost only because it
is slightly more popular and because the D standard library uses
it. I'm perfectly happy with MIT, though, and already cloned SDC
:)
Just interested about motivation behind choosing MIT.
