On 2012-04-19 21:54, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
MIT's *much* easier to understand though. Boost has some real goofy, obfuscated wordings. Although it's *worlds* better in that regard than the completely impenatrable GPL or Creative Commons.
What I like about the Boost license is that it says explicitly that no attribution is needed for binary distribution.
The zlib/libpng license on the other hand says so implicitly. -- /Jacob Carlborg
