On Wednesday, July 04, 2012 09:58:09 Roman D. Boiko wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 at 07:53:32 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote: > > On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 at 07:40:55 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote: > >> I'll propose "spendFront", which is pretty much the same > >> thing, but is less loaded. I'm not entirely sure if it carries > >> the meaning as well? I think it is a worth discussion. > > > > I'm not a native speaker, but I feel that "spend" would be a > > wrong choice. > > > > fetchFront was proposed by Dmitry, which I like more than > > spendFront, but slightly less than consumeFront. > > Another option might be "readFront". That's somewhere in the > middle amond "take", "consume" and "fetch"...
Read does not imply that the element is removed from the range. Nor does fetch. Consume does. - Jonathan M Davis