On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 at 08:12:46 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, July 04, 2012 09:58:09 Roman D. Boiko wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 at 07:53:32 UTC, Roman D. Boiko
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 at 07:40:55 UTC, monarch_dodra
> wrote:
>> I'll propose "spendFront", which is pretty much the same
>> thing, but is less loaded. I'm not entirely sure if it
>> carries
>> the meaning as well? I think it is a worth discussion.
>
> I'm not a native speaker, but I feel that "spend" would be a
> wrong choice.
>
> fetchFront was proposed by Dmitry, which I like more than
> spendFront, but slightly less than consumeFront.
Another option might be "readFront". That's somewhere in the
middle amond "take", "consume" and "fetch"...
Read does not imply that the element is removed from the range.
Nor does
fetch. Consume does.
- Jonathan M Davis
Yeah... Consume is probably the best choice.
