On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 at 08:14:54 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, July 04, 2012 09:55:57 Roman D. Boiko wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 July 2012 at 04:33:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> If no one has any major objections to this scheme or can
> provide a better proposal, I'll create a pull request from
> what
> I have.
No objections.
Still would be nice to get your (or community) feedback on my
previous proposals to localize custom logic inside ranges which
invalidate value returned from front.
It sounds messy and error-prone, to be honest. And any range
that needed to
implement it and didn't would be broken.
- Jonathan M Davis
(1) Why/how was it messy/error-prone? Wasn't it doing exactly
what you want right now?
(2) How would creating an identical method with a different name
make the situation better?
