Hi Michael.

Code isn't published, because it belongs to a project for the company I
work for. But it was all in python and just for the combinations I
needed... so you are probably not missing anything. :)

Sorry.

2016-07-29 9:08 GMT-03:00 Michael Dickens <michael.dick...@ettus.com>:

> Hi Francisco - Yes, I think having a generic ZMQ block would be awesome.
> Do you have an OOT module or block that does what you listed: a generic ZMQ
> block? If so, how do I gain access to it? This would save me lots of time!
> Thanks! - MLD
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Francisco Albani wrote:
>
> Michael, I found the need to do the same for some applications. I also
> needed to choose between bind and connect (I made this a parameter of my
> block).
> Wouldn't be better to have just one sink and one source with selectable
> options, like:
> * socket_type: REP/REQ/SUB/PUB/PUSH/PULL
> * method: bind / connect
> * interface: stream / message
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to