I think that, then autoscroll would set the images to false.
For example, some pseudocode:
if(autoscroll == true) {
show prev/next images;
}
Jan Sorgalla wrote:
>
> Yea, i thought about that long time. Also regarding Justins suggestion:
>
> Justin Carter wrote:
>>
>> In an ideal world it would actually be nice to achieve with just a
>> class name on the unordered list, but I know that might be taking it a
>> bit too far :)
>>
>
> At the end, i decided not to handle "layout" issues with jCarousel. Think
> about a situation where someone don't wants to have buttons. For example
> he wants to just let autoscroll the carousel without wanting interactions
> by the user.
>
> Jan
>
>
> Dan Atkinson wrote:
>>
>> Sorry. My mistake.
>>
>> I meant removing the left and right button handlers
>> (prevButtonStateHandler, nextButtonStateHandler).
>>
>> If I remove these in jCarousel, the left and right buttons are no longer
>> visible, and I have no way of moving between images manually without
>> adding in the handlers.
>>
>> It would be great for the default package to contain both sets of images
>> (prev/next & enabled/disabled), and then the image links could be
>> overridden if the user so chose.
>>
>> I'd try an explain in Deutsche, but it's much worse than your English! ;)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/jCarousel-tf2205628.html#a6138170
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
