I think that, then autoscroll would set the images to false. For example, some pseudocode:
if(autoscroll == true) { show prev/next images; } Jan Sorgalla wrote: > > Yea, i thought about that long time. Also regarding Justins suggestion: > > Justin Carter wrote: >> >> In an ideal world it would actually be nice to achieve with just a >> class name on the unordered list, but I know that might be taking it a >> bit too far :) >> > > At the end, i decided not to handle "layout" issues with jCarousel. Think > about a situation where someone don't wants to have buttons. For example > he wants to just let autoscroll the carousel without wanting interactions > by the user. > > Jan > > > Dan Atkinson wrote: >> >> Sorry. My mistake. >> >> I meant removing the left and right button handlers >> (prevButtonStateHandler, nextButtonStateHandler). >> >> If I remove these in jCarousel, the left and right buttons are no longer >> visible, and I have no way of moving between images manually without >> adding in the handlers. >> >> It would be great for the default package to contain both sets of images >> (prev/next & enabled/disabled), and then the image links could be >> overridden if the user so chose. >> >> I'd try an explain in Deutsche, but it's much worse than your English! ;) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dan >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jCarousel-tf2205628.html#a6138170 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/