John Resig wrote: > > > I guess the issue that I have with it is that there's a definite > demand for leaving the markup as semantic content - and no demand for > custom multiple controls. I mean, it's a case of a number of people > (myself included) wanting to write semantic vs a bunch of imaginary > people wanting to write custom controls ;-) > Alright, boss ;-)
John Resig wrote: > > Here's a compromise: Leave .jcarousel() as is, but create a new > function called something like: .makeCarousel() which does what I > mentioned before. It takes a OL/UL list, wraps all the content around > it, then calls .jcarousel() and turns it in to one. That's the best of > both worlds. > Seriously, thats exactly what i thought about Jan Sorgalla wrote: > > I'm more thinking about an extension (jCarouselBuilder) which handles the > layout tasks (Building prev/next controls etc.)... > http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=6139607&framed=y > But while writing this, i got the following idea: Why not checking the nodeName and wrapping the html if its a UL or OL and leave it as it is otherwise? Jan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jCarousel-tf2205628.html#a6143075 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
