I dont see how moving out from a discussion after stating your opinion helps
anyone.
I reckon, there are better ways to deal with perceived arrogance and ignorance
than sarcasm. I, for one, certainly expect more on the list than one line
retorts. If there was something incorrect about what was said, it would've been
better to give an explanation on your point of view. It helps all of us on the
group to hear matured/different views on the topic or why bother replying at
all?
Regards
Manish Govind Pillewar
--- On Thu, 17/9/09, Charles B. Kreitzberg <char...@cognetics.com> wrote:
From: Charles B. Kreitzberg <char...@cognetics.com>
Subject: Re: [IxDA Discuss] What are your principles for making digital
products/services
To: "'Gilberto Medrano'" <gmedr...@gmail.com>, "'Jared Spool'" <jsp...@uie.com>
Cc: "'Thomas Petersen'" <t...@hellobrand.com>, disc...@ixda.org
Date: Thursday, 17 September, 2009, 4:36 AM
Gilberto:
I know I should keep my mouth shut here but your comments are not fair and
(at least this late at night) rather infuriating.
If you cannot see the arrogance and ignorance of a comments like
"I could write a whole book about why usability test and focus groups are
bad for
you and your customers but I wont"
or
"the reason why UCD have so much weight today is because there are a lot of
academics who don't know how to actually design (i.e. making a > decision)
so they need to take it into a process"
then there is no point in wasting time in trying to convince you.
---snipped--
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
