Besides, without access to beer and an all nighter, how else am I supposed
to make computers out of junk? (/SARCASM)


On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Omar Rassi <omar.ra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Personally, I'm not interested in policing the space, I don't come there
> to keep on eye on other members and visitors. The law doesn't disappear
> when you walk through the doors so I'm wondering why the organizing needs
> to apply more paperwork and wording on the subject.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Torrie Fischer 
> <tdfisc...@hackerbots.net>wrote:
>
>> On Friday, March 07, 2014 12:20:05 Omar Rassi wrote:
>> > I'm taking this to mean that the liability waiver is not enough anymore.
>> > Did something happen at the space recently? I'm not exactly against this
>> > idea but so far the majority of people that come to the space and
>> > participate have been adults of sound mind. Has this gotten so out of
>> hand
>> > that people are no longer able to look out for eachother or restrain
>> > themselves so Synhak Inc. needs to step in and become big brother?
>>
>> Yeah, thats my concern.
>>
>> I thought we were trying to stay away from pre-emptive rules and were
>> capable
>> of policing ourselves like adults, or having in person conversations to
>> address issues instead of slyly bringing up board vote topics that apply
>> to
>> the whole membership three days before board meetings.
>>
>> I think we need a bylaw amendment that the agenda for a board meeting
>> must be
>> issued in full with any announcement.
>>
>> Am I allowed to bring issues up minutes before the board meeting? an hour
>> into
>> it?
>>
>> I think I'll do that. I'll propose that we stop coddling the community.
>>
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Justin Herman <just...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > I think we need to set the option for you to be excused for the day
>> with
>> > > the possibility of having membership terminated or banned for
>> > > repeat/egregious behavior. Someone unwilling to cooperate to remove
>> and
>> > > mitigate the issue and safety is of concern the police should be
>> called.
>> > >
>> > > I see a drug and alcohol policy as important as our safety
>> requirements as
>> > > it put everyone at risk. Not only can SynHak be held liable but the
>> > > members
>> > > and board who allow it to continue can be held liable. Safety is of
>> > > concern
>> > > as someone could personally feel they are alright to operate
>> machinery but
>> > > miss judge they capacity.
>> > >
>> > > These are awful concerns and no one likes to think about someone
>> getting
>> > > hurt BUT without a policy SynHak can't have a leg to stand on.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Seeley, Tim (PSA-Akron) <
>> > >
>> > > tim.see...@psangelus.com> wrote:
>> > >> It might need to say something about what the adult alcohol permitted
>> > >> behavior is.
>> > >>
>> > >> V/R
>> > >> Tim Seeley
>> > >>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: discuss-boun...@synhak.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@synhak.org]
>> On
>> > >> Behalf Of Devin Wolfe
>> > >> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 11:41 AM
>> > >> To: discuss@synhak.org
>> > >> Subject: [SH-Discuss] SYNHAK Drug Policy
>> > >>
>> > >> Hello all,
>> > >> Up until now there has been no formal drug policy at synhak. But with
>> > >> several complaints and concerns raised recently I feel it is time we
>> > >> implement one. As a corporation we jeopardise ourselves if we just
>> turn a
>> > >> blind eye. Plus working around dangerous tools while under the
>> influence
>> > >> is
>> > >> a liability.
>> > >>
>> > >> Here is the wording I plan on submitting to the board:
>> > >>
>> > >> SYNHAK INC. will not condone, endorse, or allow the use of illegal
>> drugs
>> > >> or related illegal activities including but not limited to illegal
>> drug
>> > >> use, possession, sale, manufacturing, transfer, providing drugs or
>> > >> alcohol
>> > >> to a minor, or consumption of drugs or alcohol by a minor, as
>> defined and
>> > >> stated in the Ohio Revised Code, any laws or set of laws pertaining
>> to
>> > >> any
>> > >> location where SYNHAK INC. is at that time conducting business. This
>> > >> pertains but is not limited to agents, representatives, volunteers,
>> > >> members, nonmembers, employees, and contractors.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> I would like the hear everyone's opinion on this. Also do we need an
>> > >> explicit procedure for discipline or removal if needed?
>> > >>
>> > >> Please do not accuse, slander, or otherwise make this a personal
>> matter.
>> > >> Keep names out of it.
>> > >>
>> > >> In excellence,
>> > >> Devin Wolfe
>> > >>
>> > >> Sent with AquaMail for Android
>> > >> http://www.aqua-mail.com
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> Discuss mailing list
>> > >> Discuss@synhak.org
>> > >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> Discuss mailing list
>> > >> Discuss@synhak.org
>> > >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Discuss mailing list
>> > > Discuss@synhak.org
>> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@synhak.org
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@synhak.org
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to