Malcolm Tredinnick napisał(a): > Finally, for everybody who feels that they really want to write > something in this thread about why there should be a 0.97, please accept > that (a) we are aiming for 1.0 and trying to read or intentionally > misread motivations into that, such as claiming it might be a year away > and every checkin requires a new release of third-party code, is > somewhere between speaking from no knowledge of the situation and > deliberately misrepresenting things and (b) this all came up about a > month ago with a similarly "can't make everybody happy resolution" in > [1]. All the arguments raised there, both for and against making a > release, remain valid. It might sound harsh, but nothing's changed since > then. It's very time consuming to go around again on this topic (in > fact, it will slow down the next release, and I gather people in this > thread want that as soon as possible). > > [1] > http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_frm/thread/9cc40f9273d61e1d/1a106a5dcb0233d0
Understandable but that doesn't make me happy. Anyway, Django is not supposed to make me a happy man, just to make my life of software developer a bit less boring. ;) -- Jarek Zgoda Skype: jzgoda | GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | voice: +48228430101 "We read Knuth so you don't have to." (Tim Peters) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
