On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> If I were configuring and SPF verifier to provide an input to DMARC > processing, then I would probably configure it not to reject based on SPF > fail. Then the problem doesn't arise. > > This really is a non-issue. > Are you suggesting that the DMARC spec should say that people SHOULD configure (some would say usurp) SPF in such a way? I seem to recall some contentious discussions about such usurpation during SPFbis (though I could be conflating arguments from another context). --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
