On 6/13/20 8:17 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 6/13/2020 7:53 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: >> Alas, others do, > > Other groups do all sorts of things. They once mandated OSI, for > example. > > Please explain how that is relevant, here and now. The WG needs to consider the operational impact of DMARC deployment if it is going to publish DMARC as a WG document. > > Are you perhaps suggesting that the technical work of the IETF should > worry less about technical quality and more about possible use/abuse > by other agencies?
That is a false dilemma. We can (and should) consider possible use/abuse of specifications we publish, but that does not imply worrying less about technical quality. -Jim _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
