On 6/14/2020 10:29 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
On 6/13/20 8:17 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 6/13/2020 7:53 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
Alas, others do,
Other groups do all sorts of things. They once mandated OSI, for
example.
Please explain how that is relevant, here and now.
The WG needs to consider the operational impact of DMARC deployment if
it is going to publish DMARC as a WG document.
Are you perhaps suggesting that the technical work of the IETF should
worry less about technical quality and more about possible use/abuse
by other agencies?
That is a false dilemma. We can (and should) consider possible use/abuse
of specifications we publish, but that does not imply worrying less
about technical quality.
Some people send spam. We'd better deprecate all the email specifications.
Some agencies make silly or terrible rules. And there are so many
agencies. We'd better shut down the IETF because any specification can
be abused and probably will be.
Perhaps you can offer a rather more focused, specific and deterministic
concern?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
