On October 17, 2023 7:32:22 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
>On Mon 16/Oct/2023 20:00:00 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On October 16, 2023 5:53:13 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
>>> On Fri 13/Oct/2023 16:35:43 +0200 Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
>>>> Thank you, sir. That’s part of the reason to cautiously transition away 
>>>> from the PSL. It has the feel of a throwback to a time when people thought 
>>>> the number of total users would be in the hundreds or thousands. Wouldn’t 
>>>> a cautious transition alleviate your concerns? Not everyone, everywhere 
>>>> will pull the switch at midnight.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Can we engage ICANN for sending a kind request to upgrade their DMARC 
>>> records to all PSDs?  Or can we do it on their behalf?  Or on IETF behalf?  
>>> Or?
>>> 
>>> Is that a subject for 118?
>> 
>> Which ICANN managed TLDs have DMARC records (PSDs which are either not TLDs 
>> or not ICANN managed TLDs are not anything ICANN has anything to say about)?
>
>
>According to Doug's file:
>
>ale@pcale:~/tmp/zdkimfilter/regdom$ for d in $(grep -v '^[/* ]' 
>icann_public_suffix_list.dat); do l=$(grep "^$d," 
>PSL_entries_with_DMARC_policies.csv); if [ -n "$l" ]; then echo "$d -> $l"; fi 
>done
>qld.gov.au -> qld.gov.au,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>sa.gov.au -> sa.gov.au,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>vic.gov.au -> vic.gov.au,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>wa.gov.au -> wa.gov.au,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.az -> gov.az,r,r,100,s,s,z,z
>gov.bh -> gov.bh,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.bm -> gov.bm,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>gob.bo -> gob.bo,n,n,100,r,r,z,z
>ac.gov.br -> ac.gov.br,r,r,100,s,s,z,z
>df.gov.br -> df.gov.br,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>ma.gov.br -> ma.gov.br,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>ms.gov.br -> ms.gov.br,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>pe.gov.br -> pe.gov.br,r,r,100,r,r,z,z
>pr.gov.br -> pr.gov.br,r,n,0,r,r,z,z
>rj.gov.br -> rj.gov.br,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>rn.gov.br -> rn.gov.br,q,q,0,r,r,z,z
>rs.gov.br -> rs.gov.br,n,n,10,r,r,z,z
>sp.gov.br -> sp.gov.br,n,n,100,r,r,z,z
>to.gov.br -> to.gov.br,q,q,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.bt -> gov.bt,r,r,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.by -> gov.by,r,n,0,s,s,z,z
>mil.by -> mil.by,r,r,0,r,r,z,z
>gc.ca -> gc.ca,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>gouv.ci -> gouv.ci,q,q,0,r,r,z,z
>gob.cl -> gob.cl,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.cl -> gov.cl,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>riik.ee -> riik.ee,q,n,100,r,r,z,z
>eun.eg -> eun.eg,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>cci.fr -> cci.fr,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>huissier-justice.fr -> huissier-justice.fr,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>notaires.fr -> notaires.fr,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.gd -> gov.gd,r,r,0,r,r,z,z
>gov -> gov,r,n,0,r,r,y,r
>my.id -> my.id,q,q,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.il -> gov.il,n,n,100,r,r,z,z
>nic.in -> nic.in,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.in -> gov.in,q,n,0,r,r,z,z
>edu.kz -> edu.kz,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>ac.lk -> ac.lk,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>edu.me -> edu.me,q,q,0,r,r,z,z
>ac.me -> ac.me,q,q,100,r,r,z,z
>gov.mg -> gov.mg,r,r,100,r,r,z,z
>mil -> mil,r,n,0,r,r,y,r
>gouv.ml -> gouv.ml,q,q,5,r,r,z,z
>gov.mn -> gov.mn,r,r,0,r,r,z,z
>edu.mn -> edu.mn,r,r,0,s,s,z,z
>pro.mv -> pro.mv,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>info.na -> info.na,q,q,1,r,r,z,z
>mil.no -> mil.no,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>stat.no -> stat.no,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.pn -> gov.pn,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.ps -> gov.ps,q,q,100,r,r,z,z
>sec.ps -> sec.ps,q,q,100,r,r,z,z
>gov.sc -> gov.sc,n,n,100,r,r,z,z
>gov.sg -> gov.sg,r,r,0,r,r,z,r
>gouv.sn -> gouv.sn,n,n,10,r,r,z,z
>gob.sv -> gob.sv,n,n,100,r,r,z,z
>net.sy -> net.sy,q,q,0,r,r,z,z
>tsk.tr -> tsk.tr,q,q,0,r,r,z,z
>gov.tt -> gov.tt,q,q,0,r,r,z,z
>mil.tw -> mil.tw,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>km.ua -> km.ua,n,n,100,r,r,z,z
>gov.uk -> gov.uk,r,n,0,s,s,z,r
>nhs.uk -> nhs.uk,r,n,0,s,s,z,z
>police.uk -> police.uk,n,n,0,s,s,z,z
>k12.dc.us -> k12.dc.us,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>k12.in.us -> k12.in.us,q,n,0,r,r,z,z
>k12.tn.us -> k12.tn.us,q,n,0,r,r,z,z
>k12.wa.us -> k12.wa.us,n,n,100,r,r,z,z
>agric.za -> agric.za,q,q,30,r,r,z,z
>grondar.za -> grondar.za,n,n,0,r,r,z,z
>nom.za -> nom.za,n,n,0,r,r,z,z

Unless I missed one, none of those are TLDs except gov and mil and all of the 
rest are under CC TLDs, so doubly nothing to do with ICANN.  ICANN doesn't 
manage gov and mil, but they both have psd=y in their records already, so I'm 
not sure why they are even on the list.

Scott K


_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to