> On Oct 16, 2023, at 11:00 AM, Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On October 16, 2023 5:53:13 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
>>> On Fri 13/Oct/2023 16:35:43 +0200 Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
>>> Thank you, sir. That’s part of the reason to cautiously transition away 
>>> from the PSL. It has the feel of a throwback to a time when people thought 
>>> the number of total users would be in the hundreds or thousands. Wouldn’t a 
>>> cautious transition alleviate your concerns? Not everyone, everywhere will 
>>> pull the switch at midnight.
>> 
>> 
>> Can we engage ICANN for sending a kind request to upgrade their DMARC 
>> records to all PSDs?  Or can we do it on their behalf?  Or on IETF behalf?  
>> Or?
>> 
>> Is that a subject for 118?
> 
> Which ICANN managed TLDs have DMARC records (PSDs which are either not TLDs 
> or not ICANN managed TLDs are not anything ICANN has anything to say about)?
> 
> Scott K
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Are TLD’s typically responsive to these sorts of requests? Do they each have to 
be sold on the idea?

Neil
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to