On October 16, 2023 9:20:26 PM UTC, Neil Anuskiewicz <neil=40marmot-tech....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > >> On Oct 16, 2023, at 11:00 AM, Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On October 16, 2023 5:53:13 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> >>> wrote: >>>> On Fri 13/Oct/2023 16:35:43 +0200 Neil Anuskiewicz wrote: >>>> Thank you, sir. That’s part of the reason to cautiously transition away >>>> from the PSL. It has the feel of a throwback to a time when people thought >>>> the number of total users would be in the hundreds or thousands. Wouldn’t >>>> a cautious transition alleviate your concerns? Not everyone, everywhere >>>> will pull the switch at midnight. >>> >>> >>> Can we engage ICANN for sending a kind request to upgrade their DMARC >>> records to all PSDs? Or can we do it on their behalf? Or on IETF behalf? >>> Or? >>> >>> Is that a subject for 118? >> >> Which ICANN managed TLDs have DMARC records (PSDs which are either not TLDs >> or not ICANN managed TLDs are not anything ICANN has anything to say about)? >> >> Scott K > >Are TLD’s typically responsive to these sorts of requests? Do they each have >to be sold on the idea?
It was mostly a rhetorical question. I'm reasonably confident that no such TLDs exist. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
