On 12 Apr 2023, at 21:37, Joe Abley wrote: > With regard to a flock of drones providing service for a single nameserver I > agree there are other exciting failure modes to look forward to. But, as > before, I don't think we have a shortage of ways to describe them -- no need > to economise by using a single term to describe everything that can possibly > go wrong.
And no need to invent precise terms for every different failure mode. Or, how I now and then deal with discussions where special words are used: Person: I think FOO is the best there is! Me: Can you say the same sentence again, without the use of the word "FOO"? Person: Hmm....[some good explanation which makes me understand what the person meant with the term FOO in *this* context of *this* discussion] I.e. trying to compile explanatory text into single words is in most cases impossible. The question is how useful it is? Sometimes maybe non-precise language is needed to ensure people use more words. "Broadband" anyone? Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
